Another smoking gun
DEAR CHARLIE: You cannot screw up a cue line in a world where people know you lie and then proceed to look for the obvious!
Inconsistency #984 (in addition to inconsistency #983, the cue line)
Why are the attackers speaking perfectly clear American English in France? You cannot do that in France, you will starve. They clearly say "cops are bullshit" with a perfect American accent before "shooting" the cop. Most likely military contractor ISIS, which is based in America did this job. Additionally, the sound track is unrealistically clear with perfect audio compression, an obvious studio job. There were two cameras, the cell phone cam which produced poor video, and a second camera with a professional shotgun mic. The video and soundtrack were then merged. There is simply no other way the sound could be so clear from a cell phone, the impact, frequency response, clarity, could only have been produced with a professional setup.
THE CUE LINE :-)This cinches it yet again. This wag the dog is so blatantly obvious, they totally butchered it.
Take a look in front of the car. There is a marker line there. Some have said this is just a fluid leak but it is obviously not, because in the next frames we see the continuity error - another line magically appears on the road at a 90 degree angle. Fluid leaks will not do that, they are obviously painted lines being used as cue marks for where to put the car, and this terror scene was done in multiple takes.
Since our "terrorists" only got out once, the mysteriously appearing cue line needs some explaining. 90 degree angles with the other line prove it is not a fluid leak which would flow only one direction. This totally busts the lie. I am NOT CHARLIE, Charlie can go to hell. They screwed this big time.
I have looked at the related newscast and the freudian slip, where the reporter says in clear English "the blood that has been put there" and the screw up is real. He stumbles and tries to cover it up, but a freudian slip is exactly what it is, and done as clearly as this reporter did, there is no going back.
More details
I am not feeling good today so these will be brief
The final showdown and hostage taking was irrational. I guess that sold. However, if you really did shoot a place up, the last thing to do is keep running around in stolen cars. That does not wash AT ALL. Proper procedure? Ditch the car, ditch the Jihadi outfit, get on the subway or bus and go to a place to hide out until things cool off. The fact this did not happen makes no sense to me, unless someone wanted a Hollywood style script for max effect.
They flooded Mexican television with this crap until I wanted to puke.
Farganne found two additional videos that destroy this psy op, in one video which was supposed to be in the aftermath of the police officer shooting when they were discussing where to put the flowers, one reporter can be heard saying in a questioning tone "where they put the fake blood?" This is on the Forumhttp://www.reactorbreach.com/showthread.php?tid=4194
I was very irritated by the theme "I am Charlie" fronted in France, and how fast such massive rallies were staged. How fast all the signs were printed. How fast all the light shows with that phrase got set up. Not rational at all, that made no sense at all to me. And the "I am Charlie" theme was no doubt fronted to make everyone feel touched by "Islamic terror". That just chapped me. They really took it over the top and no doubt had it all scheduled ahead of time. France scammed that better than the U.S.
Need I mention the common theme of the lost ID? Could it be any more obvious?
Charlie was going under, probably had layoffs scheduled, and now has a million magazines (far more than the usual number) going out to stores to handle excess demand caused by this publicity stunt. COME ON NOW, IF YOU JUST GOT SHOT UP, THE NEXT EDITION IS CANCELED. Sickeningly reaping it every way possible. Filthy rotten disgusting people. The layoffs (if they still happen) will be the "dead".
There. Had to vent. Back to bed.
| Jan 8 2015 UPDATE: The final SLAM on Paris terror attack added below these top 10 problems with the story Updates continuing, discuss this on the Forumhttp://www.reactorbreach.com/showthread.php?tid=4194 BUSTED: Shooting scene done Hollywood style in multiple takes, complete with continuity errors, road markers, botched audio EVERYTHING. The final bust: I thought the police officer shooting scene (the only shooting scene of any substance) was too perfect to not be staged. Now forum reader NT1 sewed it up nicely - moving markers, cue points, botched sound track, everything that could possibly be wrong if you only knew what to look for. Shooting was done in two or more Hollywood style takes that were edited together - all the proof is here: NT1 posted the following to the forum: I was unfortunate enough to see a film clip from the Biafran war on a late-night, BBC programme presented by Ludovic Kennedy many years ago. The victim had been stripped and was lying bound, begging for his life. A shot from off-screen silenced his pleas as his head and upper body were shifted violently due to energy absorption from the bullet. Another shot a second or so later produced the same head and body movement but by that time the man was dead. Shortly afterwards, the soldier who had shot him strolled into view, with a look of extreme satisfaction on his face. This was before the days of modern high-velocity weapons but illustrated all too clearly that the kinetic energy from a bullet has to go somewhere. There was no such movement on the policeman's head and body during the attack and I have to agree with Stephan at Post #94 that the smoke emission appears to emerge from his hand. However, that is not the only anomaly in this video, which appears to have been made in two takes. The video on the Liveleak site: liveleak.com/view?i=bc6_1420632668 is the best version for this but the video linked at Post #97 is the next best. My comments are made with respect to the Liveleak video. You need to watch it in Hi Res (720). Someone needs to download that video before it disappears. At the beginning, we see the two gunmen who have just emerged from their car - it would be even better if we had seen them driving up and stopping. Anyway, note that their car has stopped astride a black line drawn in the road. These are the clues you have to look for and, if you have read about the Woolwich 'murder' of Lee Rigby, especially the excellent, in-depth analyses by Chris Spivey: http://www.chrisspivey.org you will know what to expect. For the moment I'll just concentrate on the main part of the action but just try to think of a reason why the trainer has been placed carefully in the road when, as you can see from the rest of the video, both men are still wearing boots. The right hand gunman (looking at the video) disappears behind the van and the sound of shots is heard. The first three are presumably from one gun and the following five are supposed to be from another. There is far too much echo and there seems to be too much low-frequency content. This action is taking place with a park area in the background, with nothing to reflect the sound - not in a canyon. After this the camera tracks to the right and we see the policeman just finishing falling to the ground, facing in the direction of his attackers. This is not the right direction for the smoke effect. The policeman then goes out of shot (no pun intended) as the camera tracks left, waiting for the men to appear. As it follows the men, the policeman comes into view but has totally changed position and is now facing away from his attackers - but further to the left and looking over his shoulder to see where they are. He seems to synchronise his head turn-back with the progress of the man on the pathway. The 'fatal' shot is fired, with no apparent effect on the body and the shooter moves back into the road to join his companion. Both run back to the car - but something has changed. When we saw the car at the beginning, it was astride a black line. On their return, another line has appeared in the road at right angles to the first and facing out from the left-hand front wheel (looking at the video). How did that get there? No one is going to walk out into the road to mark the position of the car when there are two rampaging gunman in the area. We have to assume that it was necessary to retake part of the action and the line was added to enable the car to stop in exactly the same place before the scene was repeated. The view we see is not the only view that would have been taken at that time. There is also a short black line in the road by the front wheel of the nearest rental van. If you now look carefully through the footage again, you should be able to see various cue marks in the road and on the pathway. Note the two white marks level with the front of the car between the rental vans, for example. Can you see the white mark at the base of the vegetation, roughly in line with where the policeman collapsed after being 'shot' the first time? Note the two black dots on the pathway where the policeman fell initially but became exposed when he turned over and moved to the left. Look at the white dot on the pathway, just to the left of the green pillar and check the timing of the shot as the gunman passes it. There seem to be other marks at various points. See if you can find them. There should be much more for this video to reveal and more questions to be asked. |
No comments:
Post a Comment